Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 SEPTEMBER 2007

Customs: CITT Disassembles CBSA’s Position On Imported Safety Footwear

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

On July 25, 2007, the CITT issued its decision in Tai Lung (Canada) Ltd. v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency, AP-2006-034, in which the Tribunal stomped on the Canada Border Service Agency’s position on how footwear components imported together should be classified for customs purposes. At issue in the appeal were two types of goods imported by Tai Lung.

CanadaInternational Law

Article by Greg Kanargelidis and Elysia Van Zeyl, © 2007, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

A recent tariff classification decision by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal illustrates how an importer can lower customs duties and avoid anti-dumping duties by carefully structuring the importation of goods.

Safety Footwear Imported in Parts

On July 25, 2007, the CITT issued its decision in Tai Lung (Canada) Ltd. v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency, AP-2006-034, in which the Tribunal stomped on the Canada Border Service Agency’s position on how footwear components imported together should be classified for customs purposes. At issue in the appeal were two types of goods imported by Tai Lung. The first good was a boot upper made of leather and incorporating a metal toe cap. The second good was a plastic outer sole. Tai Lung imported the components and subjected them to a number of manufacturing operations in Canada, ultimately producing finished safety footwear. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from