Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 FEBRUARY 2019

Year-End Round-Up: Notable Trademark Case Law From 2018

Earlier this month we also issued a round-up of notable patent decisions from the last year, and our 2018 highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP covers decisions on the merits in that space.

CanadaIntellectual Property

There were many interesting trademark cases coming out of 2018, a few of which are discussed below.

Earlier this month we also issued a round-up of notable patent decisions from the last year, and our 2018 highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP covers decisions on the merits in that space.

The scope of Canada's anti-dilution remedy (section 22 of the Trademarks Act) is not limited to a defendant's use of a mark identical to a registered trademark: Energizer Brands, LLC v The Gillette Company, 2018 FC 1003

This is a decision on a motion for summary judgment brought by the defendants ("Duracell") to strike certain allegations from the plaintiff's ("Energizer's") Statement of Claim.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

See more popular content from