Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2017

Unique Designs Must Also Be Distinctive: Recent Ruling Of The Trademarks Opposition Board

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

The principal function of a trademark is to enable consumers to distinguish one's goods or services from those of a competitor in the marketplace.

CanadaIntellectual Property

The principal function of a trademark is to enable consumers to distinguish one's goods or services from those of a competitor in the marketplace.

In addition to looking at engaging logos and fanciful words, marketers are only bound by their imaginations in seeking out distinguishing devices. Trademarks can also comprise colours and shapes (i.e., the appearance or "get up" of a product as the trademark itself), and even sounds in some jurisdictions. Canadian courts, however, have found the distinctive character of colours and shapes to be quite weak. Brand owners should be mindful of this inherent limitation when determining a product's branding strategy. As the following Trademarks Opposition Board (the Board) decision demonstrates,1 proving that a product's appearance is distinctive is not an easy burden to satisfy.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from