Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MAY 2012

Responding In "Good Faith" Clarified In Canada

Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall LLP/s.r.l.
Explore more from Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall LLP/s.r.l.

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal case of Corlac Inc. v. Weatherford Canada Ltd. (2011 FCA 228 [Weatherford]) has provided a welcome clarification to good faith requirements in Canadian Patent Practice.

CanadaIntellectual Property
Mark Vickers
Mark Vickers

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal case of Corlac Inc. v. Weatherford Canada Ltd. (2011 FCA 228 [Weatherford]) has provided a welcome clarification to good faith requirements in Canadian Patent Practice.

Section 73 of the Patent Act provides, in part, that:

73. (1) An application for a patent in Canada shall be deemed to be abandoned if the applicant does not (a) reply in good faith to any requisition made by an Examiner in connection with an examination, within six months after the requisition is made or within any shorter period established by the Commissioner;

In interpreting S. 73(1) of the Patent Act, an earlier line of cases of the Federal Court (i.e., G.D. Searle & co. v. Novopharm Ltd., 2007 FC 81, 56 CPR (4th)1 and Lundbeck Canada Inc. v. Ratiopharm Inc, 2009 FC 1102) had surprised the patent community. The Federal Court held that submissions to the Patent Office made during the prosecution of an application, which were judged by the Court not to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from