Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 AUGUST 2020

No Solution? No Problem! The Federal Court Of Canada Puts A Dagger In The "Problem-Solution" Approach To Patent Claims Construction

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The Federal Court of Canada's decision in Choueifaty v Attorney General of Canada, 2020 FC 837 ("Choueifaty") will undoubtedly be one of 2020's top patent cases in Canada.

CanadaIntellectual Property

The Federal Court of Canada's decision in Choueifaty v Attorney General of Canada, 1 ("Choueifaty") will undoubtedly be one of 2020's top patent cases in Canada. But this decision will not be known for creating new law. Rather, this decision will be known for the Federal Court's dressing down of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office's internally developed approach to how the Office's patent examiners construe patent claims. This bulletin will be of interest to patent practitioners and patent applicants.

Background

The test for determining the essential elements of a patent claim is set out in the 2000 Supreme Court of Canada decisions of Free World Trust2 and Whirlpool.3 As aptly summarized in the subsequent 2006 Federal Court of Appeal decision of Halford:4

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from