Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MAY 2017

No Charges By ISP For Performing Its Duties Under The Notice And Notice Regime

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Unlike many countries which provide an effective "notice and take down" remedy for copyright owners whose works are wrongly posted on Internet sites, Canada has implemented a "notice and notice" regime.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Unlike many countries which provide an effective "notice and take down" remedy for copyright owners whose works are wrongly posted on Internet sites, Canada has implemented a "notice and notice" regime. In Voltage Pictures, LLC v John Doe, 2016 FC 881, the Federal Court interpreted some aspects of that regime in a proposed reverse class action suit brought by several parties against a John Doe defendant. The issue of a claim by the ISP for reasonable compensation for the services that the innocent third party would be obligated to provide were addressed by the Federal Court of Appeal in Voltage Pictures, LLC v John Doe, 2017 FCA 97.

The applicants are a number of organizations that claim copyrights in works alleged to be infringed by an unknown respondent and made application for a disclosure order "in accordance with" sections 41.25 and 41.26 of the Copyright Act. Section 41.25 provides the ability of a copyright owner to send a notice to the person providing

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from