Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2024

Navigating The Grey: Deciphering "Use" In Patent Infringement Claims

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

In a recent case of Steelhead LNG (ASLNG) Ltd. v. Arc Resources Ltd. [Steelhead], the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) discussed the topic of what constitutes "use" of a patented invention in the context...

CanadaIntellectual Property

In a recent case of Steelhead LNG (ASLNG) Ltd. v. Arc Resources Ltd. [Steelhead,1 the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) discussed the topic of what constitutes "use" of a patented invention in the context of infringement under section 42 of the Patent Act.2

Background

The appellants own Canadian Patent No. 3,027,085 (the "Patent") that relates to apparatus, methods, and systems for the liquefaction of natural gas.3 The claimed invention – a floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility – comprises three key elements: (i) a floating modular design; (ii) an air-cooled liquefaction process; and (iii) electric-driven compressors.4

The appellants had disclosed confidential information pertaining to the Patent, including the design of a proposed FLNG facility, to the respondents.5 The respondents then prepared a preliminary engineering design study for a FLNG facility, which contained engineering drawings and specifications, and disclosed the design study to potential

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from