Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2026

Navigating Patentable Subject Matter Eligibility In Canada: Dusome Joins The Fold

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

On November 12, 2025, the Federal Court (FC) released its decision in Dusome v Canada (Attorney General), the latest development in Canada's ongoing struggle to define patentable subject matter...

CanadaIntellectual Property

On November 12, 2025, the Federal Court (FC) released its decision in Dusome v Canada (Attorney General),1 the latest development in Canada's ongoing struggle to define patentable subject matter under section 2 of the Patent Act (the Act). The FC remitted Canadian Patent Application No. 2,701,028 (the 028 Application) for expedited re-examination and held that the Commissioner of Patents (the Commissioner) committed four errors of law in refusing the 028 Application. The 028 Application claims a "Method for Playing a Card Game."

The decision attempts to reconcile previous FC and Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) case law on patentable subject matter, including: Amazon.com v Canada (Attorney General),2 Choueifaty v Canada (Attorney General),3 and Canada (Attorney General) v Benjamin Moore.4 The FC and FCA have repeatedly emphasized purposive construction while resisting categorical exclusions — only to see those principles unevenly applied by patent examiners in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from