Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 DECEMBER 2022

Interpreting Claims In Canadian Patent Law: Purposive Construction And "Essential" Elements

MLT Aikins LLP
MLT Aikins LLP
Contributor
MLT Aikins LLP

MLT Aikins LLP

FIRM OVERVIEW MLT Aikins is a full-service business law firm of more than 375 lawyers with a deep...

View firm profile
Explore more from MLT Aikins LLP

In Canada, the anatomy of a patent (also known as the specification) consists of four parts: the abstract, the claims, the description and the drawings.

CanadaIntellectual Property

In Canada, the anatomy of a patent (also known as the specification) consists of four parts: the abstract, the claims, the description and the drawings. Legally and commercially, the most important element is the claims – and a recent court decision has affirmed a long-standing approach on how to interpret patent claims.

The recently decided Benjamin Moore & Co. v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 923 ("Benjamin Moore") further affirmed the two highly influential decisions commenting on claims construction in Free World Trust c Électro Santé Inc, 2000 SCC 66 ("Free World Trust") and Whirlpool Corp. v Camco Inc., 2000 SCC 67 ("Whirlpool"). These decisions emphasized the importance of "purposive construction" and interpreting claims with reference to their "essential" elements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from