Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2014

Federal Court Considers Whether Copyright Subsists In Five-Digit Codes And The Elements Of A Valid Certification Mark

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

A recent decision of the Federal Court determined whether copyright subsisted in five-digit codes and considered the elements of a valid certification mark

CanadaIntellectual Property

A recent decision of the Federal Court1 determined whether copyright subsisted in five-digit codes and considered the elements of a valid certification mark.

The Respondent Denturist Association of Canada ("DAC") owned copyright registrations relating to its Procedure Codes and Fee Guides which included five-digit numerical codes, a description of services to be associated with the numerical codes (the "Codes") and possible fees. The five-digit Codes identified the services denturists performed when submitting claims to insurance companies or third party payers. The Procedure Codes and Fee Guides were licensed to DAC's provincial associations (including the Respondent Denturist Association of Ontario ("DAO")), and those provincial associations were authorized to use and reproduce portions of the Procedure Codes and Fee Guides. DAC also owned a trade-mark registration for the certification mark "DD" for denturist services.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from