Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2013

5 Things Every Retailer Should Consider When Threatened With Patent Infringement: 5-Item Checklist

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

A five-item checklist that every retailer should consider before responding to a threat of patent infringement.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Introduction

In recent years major Canadian retailers have been named as defendants in patent infringement lawsuits, including Wal-Mart (T-1841-11), Costco (T-1841-11), Canadian Tire (T-1002-12) and Home Depot (T-1112-13).  The common thread linking these and other cases is that the plaintiff is asserting patent rights against a retailer that sells, but does not manufacture, allegedly infringing products in its stores.

Indemnity agreements between retailers and manufacturers who supply product are common.  However, such agreements may not provide retailers with sufficient protection.  Plaintiffs will often pursue retailers because they are more likely to satisfy a judgment than manufacturers.  Sometimes, plaintiffs do not even know the manufacturer's identity.  Even the best indemnities amount only to a contractual right to sue for losses, which may have limited value in the event that the manufacturer cannot cover the retailer's losses or where the manufacturer's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from