Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2018

2017 Life Sciences Intellectual Property Law In Review

2017 saw a number of important court decisions and legislative developments with respect to intellectual property in Canada. Here we provide a brief summary and links to some of the highlights ...

CanadaIntellectual Property

2017 saw a number of important court decisions and legislative developments with respect to intellectual property in Canada.  Here we provide a brief summary and links to some of the highlights and comment on what is on the horizon for the life sciences in 2018.

The Promise Doctrine Comes to an End

In June 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") released their unanimous decision in AstraZeneca v Apotex, 2017 SCC 36 ("AstraZeneca") finding that the Promise Doctrine "is not good law" and clarifying the utility requirement under section 2 of the Patent Act. The case related to Canadian Patent no. 2,139,653 that provided patent protection for AstraZeneca's Nexium®, a small molecule used for the treatment of acid reflux disease. The SCC noted that the Promise Doctrine was "excessively onerous", and regarded it as running "counter to the words of the Act by requiring that where multiple promised uses are expressed, they all must be satisfied for the patent to meet the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from