Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JANUARY 2019

The Deduction Of Accident Benefits In Tort Actions

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

In the 2018 decisions of Cadieux v. Clouthier and Carroll v. McEwen, the Ontario Court of Appeal clarified the manner in which accident benefits are to be deducted from awards of tort damages.

CanadaInsurance

In the 2018 decisions of Cadieux v. Clouthier and Carroll v. McEwen, the Ontario Court of Appeal clarified the manner in which accident benefits are to be deducted from awards of tort damages.

In the past, there were two approaches. The 2015 case of Gilbert v. South was an example of the strict matching or apples-to-apples approach. In contrast, the 2016 case of Bassandra v. Sforza is an example of the silo approach, which requires the tort award only to match generally with the broad corresponding Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule ("SABS") categories.

As a result of the competing decisions, the Court convened a five-judge panel in order to affirm the silo approach to the deduction of SABS.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from