Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MARCH 2026

Supreme Court Of Canada Clarifies Nullification Of Coverage Doctrine

On January 30, 2026 the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-awaited decision in Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Co. The Court had to consider the relationship between a homeowner's property...

CanadaInsurance

On January 30, 2026 the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-awaited decision in Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Co. The Court had to consider the relationship between a homeowner's property policy's Guaranteed Rebuilding Cost ("GRC") endorsement and its by-laws exclusion. Both kinds of clauses are common in homeowner's policies and certain other property insurance products.

As is typical, in Emond, the by-laws exclusion restricted coverage for any additional costs that an insured would incur to comply with any laws regulating zoning, demolition, repair or construction of a building. Thus, where a property policy covers the replacement of a home with one of like kind and quality, the by-law exclusion would exclude any additional costs that have to be incurred so that the property meets current by-laws.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from