Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2011

Supreme Court Clarifies When Insurance Must Respond To Defend Construction Deficiency Claims

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

In Progressive Homes Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Co., 2010, S.C.C. 33, the Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled on an insurer’s duty to defend a general contractor in the context of a construction deficiency claim.

CanadaInsurance

In Progressive Homes Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Co., 2010, S.C.C. 33, the Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled on an insurer's duty to defend a general contractor in the context of a construction deficiency claim. These cases often involve the decay of, or damage to, interior building component parts after the failure of an exterior cladding system, or portions of it. The S.C.C. ruling settled differences among provincial appellate decisions when considering the coverage of such claims under a Comprehensive General Liability ("CGL") insurance policy. The Progressive Homes decision provided some guidance on the interpretation of policy definitions of "property damage", "accident", "occurrence", and the "work performed" exclusion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from