Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2018

LTD Case Law Update - Fall 2018

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

Appeal from a trial judgment holding that the appellant, "M", as a former employee of Pitney Bowes, had no coverage for his claim under a Manulife LTD policy.

CanadaInsurance

A)  COVERAGE

MacIvor v. Pitney Bowes and Manulife 2018 ONCA 381 (CanLII) on appeal from (2017) ONSC 1550 (CanLII)

Appeal from a trial judgment holding that the appellant, "M", as a former employee of Pitney Bowes, had no coverage for his claim under a Manulife LTD policy.

M suffered a traumatic brain injury and a severe back injury during a company sponsored event in Costa Rica on April 16, 2005.  M was unaware of the permanent and disabling nature of his brain injury until after he had resigned his employment with Pitney Bowes.

Three issues were presented on appeal:  (1) whether M, as a  former employee of Pitney Bowes, was entitled to coverage under the Manulife Policy; (2) whether M submitted a timely proof of claim; and (3) whether the one-year contractual limitation period in the policy barred M's claim.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be ought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from