Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JUNE 2016

Limitation Period Trumps Invalid Election

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

Following a motor vehicle accident on June 23, 2008, the claimant sought accident benefits from her insurer.

CanadaInsurance

The recent FSCO decision on a preliminary issue in Kanagalingam v. Economical Mutual Insurance Company1 confirms that insurers can rely on the statutory two-year limitation period when a weekly benefit is properly denied, even if the underlying election of benefits is found to be invalid. In her decision, Arbitrator Morris found that even though the claimant's election of a caregiver benefit ("CGB") was an "invalid election", the subsequent claim for an income replacement benefit ("IRB") was time-barred when the claimant sought the new benefit after three years. The initial clear and unequivocal denial of the IRB following the claimant's application for benefits and election of a CGB started the clock on the two-year limitation period.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from