Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2018

Limitation Period Reconsidered For Failure To Appropriately Insure

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The underlying action in Henry dealt with a claim for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while exiting an elevator, which was alleged to have been improperly leveled at the floor.

CanadaInsurance

Henry v Thyssenkrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2018 ONSC 1659



In the recently released decision of Henry v Thyssenkrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2018 ONSC 1659, the Superior Court provided some clarity regarding the appropriate limitation period for claims based on a party's failure to obtain the required insurance. The Henry decision runs contrary to the recently released Brookstreet v Economical decision by the same Court, which BLG previously reported on in our bulletin.

The underlying action in Henry dealt with a claim for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while exiting an elevator, which was alleged to have been improperly leveled at the floor. The elevator was located in the residential apartment building of the defendant owner, which was managed by the defendant property management company (the "principals"). The plaintiff sued the principals as well as the elevator maintenance contractor. While the maintenance contractor had obtained

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from