Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2014

Is Anybody Home? BCCA Clarifies Scope Of Vacancy Exclusion In Homeowner’s Policy

Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Explore more from Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP

The British Columbia Court of Appeal in Coburn v. Family Insurance Solutions clarified the scope of a vacancy exclusion in a homeowner’s policy.

CanadaInsurance

The British Columbia Court of Appeal in Coburn v. Family Insurance Solutions, 2014 BCCA 73, recently clarified the scope of a vacancy exclusion in a homeowner's policy, concluding that a house with no one living in it for more than 30 days is vacant even where:

  • the homeowner attends the property daily to conduct renovations;
  • the homeowner sleeps in the house for a night;
  • the homeowner has secured prospective tenants; and
  • the prospective tenants store personal possessions on the property.

In Coburn, the homeowners began extensive renovations to a house they had previously rented to long-term tenants whose lease had come to an end. While those renovations were underway, no one lived in the house. The previous tenants had already removed all their belongings, and they were not going to return. The homeowners stored a mattress in the garage, but they did not store any personal items, furnishings or equipment in the home for their use. The homeowners found

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from