Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2024

Exclusion Clause Sinks Homeowner's Claim In Subsidence Dispute

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

Tremblett v TD Insurance Direct Agency Ltd., 2024 BCCA 358 demonstrates the importance of well-drafted exclusion clauses in insurance policies. In this case, the BC Court of Appeal ("BCCA")...

CanadaInsurance

Introduction

Tremblett v TD Insurance Direct Agency Ltd., 2024 BCCA 358 demonstrates the importance of well-drafted exclusion clauses in insurance policies. In this case, the BC Court of Appeal ("BCCA") found that the exclusion clause in an insurance policy clearly and unambiguously excluded coverage for damage caused by subsidence. Even though subsidence was only one of several causes of damage to the plaintiff's home, the clear language used in the exclusion clause effectively denied the plaintiff's claim for coverage in full.

Background

Mr. Tremblett is the owner of a property in Okanagan Falls, British Columbia (the "Property"). In February 2020, he purchased a home insurance policy for the Property, including extended water coverage (the "Policy"), from the defendant, Primmum Insurance Company ("Primmum"). Mr. Tremblett left for a short vacation and, upon his return, discovered that his Property, including his house and backyard, had been damaged by

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from