Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2016

Days May Be Numbered For The Material Contribution Causation Test

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

Arbitrator John Wilson has released a decision casting doubt on the appropriateness of the prevalent use of the material contribution test for causation in accident benefit matters.

CanadaInsurance

Arbitrator John Wilson has released a decision casting doubt on the appropriateness of the prevalent use of the material contribution test for causation in accident benefit matters. 

In Kofi Agyapong v. Jevco Insurance Company, FSCO A11-003445, among numerous other issues, Arbitrator Wilson was asked to determine whether the claimant was entitled to a non earner benefit and a housekeeping benefit as a result of his involvement in a July 12, 2005 accident wherein he was struck as a pedestrian by a pick-up truck.

Arbitrator Wilson found that while Agyapong's involvement in the accident likely contributed to post accident complaints, there was no credible evidence led on his behalf that would satisfy either the "but for" causation analysis or the "material contribution" test due to his extensive pre-accident complaints, which remained quite similar following the accident.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from