Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2018

Active/Passive Income Not An IRB Consideration

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

In the recent LAT decision of A.S. and Economical Insurance (16-003197/AABS), Adjudicator Robert Watt held that an insurer is entitled to deduct post-accident income from a claimant's business in determining an ...

CanadaInsurance

In the recent LAT decision of A.S. and Economical Insurance (16-003197/AABS), Adjudicator Robert Watt held that an insurer is entitled to deduct post-accident income from a claimant's business in determining an Income Replacement Benefit amount under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule ("SABs").

The claimant, a chiropractor, had to hire another chiropractor after the accident to treat patients. While not active in the day to day operations of the business, the claimant continued to be responsible for the control of the business and made all of the major business decisions.

The Adjudicator held that the SABs does not differentiate between passive and active income.  Accordingly, the test was not whether or not the claimant was active in the business, but simply whether or not he had income from the business.  Since he had income from the business, and even though he was less involved in the business, and making less money, he was still making income from the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from