Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 FEBRUARY 2012

Secured Creditors May Assert Priority Over Proceeds Of A Fraudulent Preference Action

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In the decision of Justice Morawetz of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) (the "Court") in "In the Matter of Aero Inventory (UK) Limited and Aero Inventory PLC", the Court held that proceeds of a fraudulent preference action recovered by a trustee in bankruptcy under section 95 of the "Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act" ("BIA") may be subject to the rights of secured creditors, to the extent secured creditors had rights in the collateral in question at the time of the impugned t

CanadaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

In the decision of Justice Morawetz of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) (the "Court") in In the Matter of Aero Inventory (UK) Limited and Aero Inventory PLC, the Court held that proceeds of a fraudulent preference action recovered by a trustee in bankruptcy under section 95 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act ("BIA") may be subject to the rights of secured creditors, to the extent secured creditors had rights in the collateral in question at the time of the impugned transaction. Hence, in some cases the benefit of a preference action may accrue primarily to a secured creditor. There may be significant value available to secured creditors if they do not have to share with unsecured creditors.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from