Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 FEBRUARY 2022

Reverse Vesting Orders – When Is This "Extraordinary Measure" Appropriate?

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

Reverse vesting orders (or "RVOs") have become an increasingly popular and useful tool for maximizing recovery in complex insolvencies in Canada, particularly in circumstances where traditional alternatives of asset sales or restructuring plans are not effective or practical.

CanadaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Reverse vesting orders (or "RVOs") have become an increasingly popular and useful tool for maximizing recovery in complex insolvencies in Canada, particularly in circumstances where traditional alternatives of asset sales or restructuring plans are not effective or practical. RVOs are very attractive to purchasers of distressed businesses because they can efficiently preserve the value of permits, tax losses and other assets which cannot be easily transferred to a purchaser through an asset transaction. Unlike a plan, court approval of a RVO does not require a creditor vote.

In our May 2021 bulletin, we reviewed two decisions, Nemaska Lithium1 and Quest University2, where Quebec and British Columbia appellate courts upheld the approval of RVOs in the face of stakeholder opposition.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from