Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 AUGUST 2007

Defending Actions Against Shareholders Of Dissolved Corporations

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

On January 30, 2007, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in "Enron Canada Corp. v. Husky Oil Operations Ltd."

CanadaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Article by Michelle Spence, © 2007, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Energy - Oil & Gas, July 2007

On January 30, 2007, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in Enron Canada Corp. v. Husky Oil Operations Ltd. The Court held that a shareholder has a right to defend an action under section 227(4) of the Alberta Business Corporations Act (the Act) by defending the merits of the underlying actions against the dissolved corporation.

Section 227(4) allows a party with a valid claim against a dissolved corporation to pursue shareholders who received corporate property on dissolution, to the extent of that property. Without this provision, a corporation could simply dissolve and largely avoid its obligations to third parties. Although the Act also allows third parties having valid claims to proceed against the dissolved corporation, the dissolved corporation is merely an empty shell having distributed its assets, if any, to its

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from