Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JUNE 2005

Arm’s Length And Back-To-Back Loans

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

One of the critical elements in complying with the 5/25 exemption is that the borrower and lender must act at arm’s length at the time an interest payment is made. Whether or not parties act at arm’s length is a mixed question of law and fact. Related persons are deemed not to deal at arm’s length. It is a question of fact whether other persons deal at arm’s length.

CanadaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Article by Bill Maclagan, ©2005 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Taxation - April 2005

One of the critical elements in complying with the 5/25 exemption is that the borrower and lender must act at arm’s length at the time an interest payment is made. Whether or not parties act at arm’s length is a mixed question of law and fact. Related persons are deemed not to deal at arm’s length. It is a question of fact whether other persons deal at arm’s length.

Because a corporation and the person who controls it are related, a loan from a foreign parent to a Canadian subsidiary cannot fit within the 5/25 exemption. As a result, corporations have from time to time attempted to structure intercorporate debt so as to fit within the 5/25 exemption. Various structures have included "back-to-back" loans where cash is loaned from a foreign parent to an arm’s length foreign company that then lends to the Canadian subsidiary and loans from a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from