Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 APRIL 2015

Court Upholds First Nations’ Right To Bring Claims Based On Interference With Unproven Aboriginal Rights And Title

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

It is important to note that the court's reasoning is not only applicable to aboriginal rights but also to treaty rights, which are equally protected by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

In its recent decision in Saik'uz First Nation and Stellat'en First Nation v. Rio Tinto Alcan Inc., the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (BCCA) confirmed that First Nations may bring actions against private parties in nuisance and breach of riparian rights on the basis of unproven aboriginal rights and title claims as well as Indian reserve rights.

BACKGROUND

Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. (RTA) owns the Kenney Dam (Dam) on the Nechako River (River) in northwestern British Columbia. The Saik'uz First Nation and Stellat'en First Nation (First Nations) allege that the Dam's diversion and alteration of the water flowing to the River has caused significant adverse impacts on their fisheries resources. The First Nations claimed these impacts unreasonably interfered with their unproven aboriginal title and rights, and their interests as beneficial holders of Indian reserves, justifying an action in nuisance and for breach of riparian rights.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from