Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2016

Usury Update From Québec Court

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

It is now settled law that application fees and similar charges are considered when calculating interest for purposes of offences under Canada's criminal code...

CanadaFinance and Banking

It is now settled law that application fees and similar charges are considered when calculating interest for purposes of offences under Canada's criminal code but a recent Québec case provides some interesting guidance as to the civil consequences of such a finding.

In Pépin v. B2B Alliance Inc. (2016 QCCS 852), the Québec Superior Court examined the actual or real interest rate applicable to a loan without it being actually forming part of the pleadings.

Having found that the application fee when calculated into the total charges violated the usury rate of 60 per cent, the court then refused to read down the provision or sever the offensive fee (as might have been possible in other jurisdictions) and declared the entire contract null. It is not clear if the contract itself included a waterfal provision giving the court a "blue pencil" to read down.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from