Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2015

Prohibited Penalty Or Incentive For Good Performance? Interpreting The Interest Act

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

In a recent decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Lougheed Block, the Court considered the question of whether incentives for prompt payment in a mortgage agreement, which would be lost upon default...

CanadaFinance and Banking

In a recent decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Lougheed Block1, the Court considered the question of whether incentives for prompt payment in a mortgage agreement, which would be lost upon default, offend the prohibition on penalties for non-performance contained in section 8 of the federal Interest Act.2

Section 8 codifies a long-standing equitable principle and prohibits a fine, penalty or rate of interest "on any arrears of principal or interest" that has "the effect of increasing the charge on the arrears beyond the rate of interest payable on principal money not in arrears". The provision prohibits penalties for non-performance on loans secured by mortgages of real property. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from