Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JANUARY 2012

MarketCaps @ Gowlings - December 23, 2011 - Volume 7, Number 10

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

In a unanimous decision released on December 22, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the Federal government's proposed Canadian "Securities Act" (the "Proposed Act") as presently drafted is not valid under the general branch of the Federal power to regulate trade and commerce under section 91(2) of the "Constitution Act, 1867".

CanadaFinance and Banking

In this issue:

  • Supreme Court Releases Decision on Proposed Securities Act - Details

Supreme Court Releases Decision on Proposed Securities Act - Details

By: Kelley McKinnon and Brent Arnold

In a unanimous decision released on December 22, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the Federal government's proposed Canadian Securities Act (the "Proposed Act") as presently drafted is not valid under the general branch of the Federal power to regulate trade and commerce under section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867. The Proposed Act would have established a national securities regulatory regime to replace the existing legislation and regulators of participating provinces and territories. Kelley McKinnon and Brent Arnold of Gowlings represented Teachers Pension Plan Board in the proceedings before the Supreme Court of Canada.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from