Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 NOVEMBER 2012

Inadvertently Discharged PPSA Financing Statement Saved By Equity (But Caution, This Will Not Always Occur)

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

A recent Supreme Court of British Columbia decision in "KBA Canada v. 3S Printers Inc." held that where a BC PPSA financing statement has been inadvertently discharged and there is no prejudice to subordinate creditors, the court can make an order giving priority to the discharged creditor.

CanadaFinance and Banking

A recent Supreme Court of British Columbia decision in KBA Canada v. 3S Printers Inc. held that where a BC PPSA financing statement has been inadvertently discharged and there is no prejudice to subordinate creditors, the court can make an order giving priority to the discharged creditor. This should provide comfort to lenders that a court will impose equity where doing so is consistent with the BC PPSA, but given the limits of equitable intervention and that financing statements can be discharged without confirmation of authority, lenders should consider periodically checking the status of their registrations in conjunction with appropriate credit events.

In this case1 heard before Justice Kelleher of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the BC Personal Property Security Act ("BC PPSA") financing statement on which a creditor relied to provide it with a purchase money security interest ("PMSI") in certain equipment was inadvertently discharged. A dispute arose

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from