Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 DECEMBER 2016

Chasing Ontario PPSA Estoppel Letters From Uncooperative Creditors

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Ontario uses a "check-the-box" system on financing statements to secure personal property under the PPSA...

CanadaFinance and Banking

Why Estoppel Letters Are Needed

Ontario uses a "check-the-box" system on financing statements to secure personal property under the PPSA1. This means that creditors must, when filing a financing statement, indicate which categories of collateral their registration relates to by marking the appropriate check-boxes, which include "consumer goods," "inventory," "equipment,", "accounts," "motor vehicle" and "other". From a practical perspective, this leads to the convention whereby creditors will often mark the "other" box as a way to broadly cover their bases with respect to describing the assets subject to their security interests. There is nothing problematic with this practice in and of itself, but it can sometimes pose problems for a debtor down the road if attempting to obtain new or additional financing from a different creditor.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from