Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 DECEMBER 2010

CEO’s at Risk for Public Company Press Releases

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

A recent decision of the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) concerning the responsibility of a CEO for his company’s 2003 press release, which contained information concerning an accident and its effect on third-quarter earnings results, has received considerable press comment.

CanadaFinance and Banking

A recent decision of the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) concerning the responsibility of a CEO for his company's 2003 press release, which contained information concerning an accident and its effect on third-quarter earnings results, has received considerable press comment.

The press treated as novel the OSC's finding that Eugene Melnyk, who was CEO of Biovail Corporation at the time of the release, had acted contrary to the public interest in allowing the release of information even though no violation of the Securities Act had been demonstrated. (Before Mr. Melnyk's case was heard, Biovail had settled the charges brought against it by the OSC.)

In fact, the OSC's finding is not a novel development at all. The OSC has a very well-established jurisdiction under the Securities Act to impose penalties in the public interest, and it has been established for decades that the OSC can exercise its public interest jurisdiction in the absence of a Securities Act viola

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from