Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2012

Will The SCC Grant Leave In Smith v Inco?

Will the Supreme Court of Canada grant leave to Ellen Smith to appeal the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal rejecting her class action against Inco for the historic nickel contamination of soil in Port Colborne?

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

Will the Supreme Court of Canada grant leave to Ellen Smith to appeal the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal rejecting her class action against Inco for the historic nickel contamination of soil in Port Colborne?

My friends in the environmental bar would appreciate clarification of the scope of "physical damage to land" nuisance, and of Rylands v Fletcher, but can Smith overcome her loss on damages as well as liability? By popular request, here in one place are Smith's Leave To Appeal Application, Inco's response, and Smith's Reply.

Inco's response includes some fascinating excerpts from the transcript. For example, even though Ms. Smith refused to allow Inco to perform the MOE-ordered cleanup of her property, leaving it contaminated well above the 8000 ppm Community Based Risk Assessment standard, (and even farther above the province-wide standard for nickel), she and her husband obtained a mortgage on the contaminated property in 2009 from a major bank. (Nor

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from