Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JULY 2019

Vesting Off Interests In Land: The Latest Dianor Decision

The Ontario Court of Appeal has released its much anticipated second decision in Third Eye Capital Corporation v. Ressources Dianor Inc./Dianor Resources Inc.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources
Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP
Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

The Ontario Court of Appeal has released its much anticipated second decision in Third Eye Capital Corporation v. Ressources Dianor Inc./Dianor Resources Inc. The issue squarely before the Court in this case was whether a vesting order granted in a receivership proceeding could extinguish a third party's interest in land in the nature of a gross overriding royalty (GOR). The Court concluded that it had the jurisdiction to do so. This appears to be the first case in Canada to reach this conclusion in the context of a GOR.

Background and prior decisions

Before reviewing the Court's analysis and findings, it is prudent to review the facts of this case as well as the prior Dianor decisions. In 2015, a receiver was appointed over the assets of Dianor, an insolvent exploration company focused on the acquisition and exploitation of mining properties in Canada. Dianor's main asset was a group of mining claims located in Ontario and Quebec. In acquiring certain mining

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from