Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2014

Thomas v. Rio Tinto Alcan Inc., 2013 BCSC 2303

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In this decision, the British Columbia Supreme Court struck an action for injunctive relief brought by two First Nations against Rio Tinto Alcan (Rio Tinto).

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

Thomas v. Rio Tinto Alcan Inc., 2013 BCSC 2303

In this decision, the British Columbia Supreme Court struck an action for injunctive relief brought by two First Nations against Rio Tinto Alcan (Rio Tinto). The First Nations had advanced claims in private nuisance and breach of riparian rights. In striking the claims, the Court held that they had no reasonable chance of success because:

1. in order to succeed on their claim in nuisance, the First Nations needed a proven interest in land and not merely an asserted, but unproven, claim to aboriginal rights and title; and

2. the First Nations' interests in Reserve lands did not confer on the First Nations sufficient riparian or property rights to support a claim in nuisance or breach of riparian rights.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from