Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2008

The Changing Face Of Energy Regulation In Canada

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

At one time, energy regulatory counsel could often predict the decision of an energy regulator - whether in respect of utility rates or new pipeline or transmission facilities - with a degree of accuracy.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

Article By James H. Smellie and Marie C. Rounding GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP1

Introduction

At one time, energy regulatory counsel could often predict the decision of an energy regulator - whether in respect of utility rates or new pipeline or transmission facilities - with a degree of accuracy. This was not so much because the regulator's thinking was overly transparent, but rather that the parameters of economic cost of service regulation were quite predictable, and the primary criteria for approval of such facilities were also focused primarily on well-known concepts of need and economic feasibility.

Energy regulators continue to approve rates and projects that are in the "public interest"; that overriding criterion has not changed. But as the energy sector has evolved into a more competitive, market-driven industry, so too have decision-makers evolved to oversee markets rather than just entities, and to make their decisions with a view to accommodating a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from