Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2016

Red Chris Development Company Ltd. V. Quock, 2015 BCSC 589

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In this case, the British Columbia Supreme Court awarded costs against members of an Aboriginal group arising out of their illegal blockade of the plaintiff's mine.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

Red Chris Development Company Ltd. V. Quock, 2015 BCSC 589

In this case, the British Columbia Supreme Court awarded costs against members of an Aboriginal group arising out of their illegal blockade of the plaintiff's mine.

Red Chris sought special costs arising out of its successful application for an injunction and enforcement order to restrain the defendants from blockading access roads to Red Chris' mine. The same individuals had previously blockaded the same mine access road and had a history of disobeying injunctions in the absence of enforcement orders.

The Court rejected the defendants' argument that costs should not be awarded because the defendants were public interest litigants. While Red Chris' mining operation and attendant environmental impact on the defendants' traditional Aboriginal territorial may well be publically important matters, the defendants' illegal blockade of the access roads was not. The Court noted that public interest is relevant to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from