Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2014

Re Canaco Resources INC., 2013 BCSECCOM 310

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

This decision of a panel of the British Columbia Securities Commission sheds some light on when drill results will be considered a "material change".

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

RE CANACO RESOURCES INC., 2013 BCSECCOM 310

This decision of a panel of the British Columbia Securities Commission (Panel) sheds some light on when drill results will be considered a "material change" requiring the issuance of a material change report. In this particular case, the Commission determined that the infill drilling results merely added to the understanding about the continuity of the deposit and were not material.

Canaco Resources Inc. (Canaco) had drilled approximately 100 drillholes at the Magambazi gold deposit in Tanzania. The drill hole assay results in question were from eight holes drilled in the Fall of 2010, and were disclosed in news releases dated December 6, 9, and 22, 2010. Canaco and its president were found to have known about the results by no later than November 29, 2010. The press releases that were ultimately issued by Canaco described some of the results as "spectacular" and "fantastic news."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from