Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2016

Rahimi V. Southgobi Resources, 2015 ONSC 5948

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In this motion for leave, the defendants relied upon the reasonable investigations defence in s. 138.4(6) of the Ontario Securities Act.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

Rahimi V. Southgobi Resources, 2015 ONSC 5948

In this motion for leave, the defendants relied upon the reasonable investigations defence in s. 138.4(6) of the Ontario Securities Act.

A coal mining company, SouthGobi, had issued a press release announcing a restatement to consolidated financial statements after the company began using GAAP. The press release resulted in a dramatic decrease in the share price. Rahmini sought leave under s. 138.8 of the Securities Act to bring a secondary securities market misrepresentation claim against SouthGobi and a number of its directors and officers.

The defendants raised the "reasonable investigation" defence, which requires a defendant establish (1) that reasonable investigations were conducted before the document was released and (2) it had no reasonable grounds to believe the document contained the misrepresentation. While the onus at trial would be to prove the defence on a balance of probabilities, the Ontario

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from