Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2013

Ontario Energy Board's Power To Order Restitution Confirmed

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The Divisional Court has recently confirmed that the Ontario Energy Board ("OEB") may order a party which has contravened an "enforceable provision" to pay restitution to those affected by the breach. The case involved retail energy marketing but appears to support broad remedial powers across a wide range of the OEB's regulatory mandate.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

The Divisional Court has recently confirmed that the Ontario Energy Board ("OEB") may order a party which has contravened an "enforceable provision" to pay restitution to those affected by the breach. The case involved retail energy marketing but appears to support broad remedial powers across a wide range of the OEB's regulatory mandate.

The Summitt Energy case

Summitt Energy Management Inc. v Ontario Energy Board1 was an appeal of an OEB order against Summitt with respect to its door-to-door sales activities. After investigating complaints into Summitt's business practices, the OEB held a hearing and found that Summitt was responsible for the acts of five agents in respect of 43 contraventions of the Ontario Energy Board Act, 19982 (the "Act").3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from