Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JANUARY 2026

Navigating 'Material Change': Takeaways From The SCC's Decision In Lundin Mining

On November 28, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") released its decision in Lundin Mining Corp. v. Markowich, providing important clarification on one of the more nuanced areas of Canadian securities law...

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

To listen to an audio recording of this article, click here.

On November 28, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") released its decision in Lundin Mining Corp. v. Markowich, providing important clarification on one of the more nuanced areas of Canadian securities law: the distinction between a "material fact" and a "material change" under the Ontario Securities Act (the "Act").

In an 8-1 decision, the SCC dismissed Lundin Mining Corp.'s ("Lundin") appeal, thereby affirming Markowich's position and confirming that the concept of a "material change" must be interpreted broadly, contextually and in a manner consistent with the investor‑protective purposes of securities legislation, rejecting the narrower, "manager-friendly standard" when it comes to what constitutes a "material change" under the Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from