Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MARCH 2012

Hidden Rock Drilling Ltd v. Klassen, 2011 BCCA 216

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The central issue in this case was the nature of the business relationship between Mr. Buchan, a prospector and owner of Hidden Rock Drilling Ltd. (Hidden Rock), and Mr. Klassen, a securities lawyer, in relation to an aggregate gravel quarry operation in northern British Columbia.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

The central issue in this case was the nature of the business relationship between Mr. Buchan, a prospector and owner of Hidden Rock Drilling Ltd. (Hidden Rock), and Mr. Klassen, a securities lawyer, in relation to an aggregate gravel quarry operation in northern British Columbia.

Hidden Rock claimed that it beneficially owned 100% of the gravel tenures and that Mr. Klassen had defrauded it out of a 50% interest in them. Mr. Klassen had performed solicitor's work for Hidden Rock and related companies, but he claimed to have been engaged with Mr. Buchan in a joint venture as equal partners.

At trial, the main question for the Court was whether the parties were in fact engaged in a joint venture, or, whether they were merely engaged in an owner-solicitor relationship. Although the terms of the relationship had not been reduced to writing, the trial judge found that the relationship contained all the characteristics of a joint venture. She held that Mr. Klassen

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from