Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2014

First Majestic Silver Corp. v Davila, 2013 BCSC 1212 And 2013 BCSC 1704

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

These decisions reviewed the appropriate terms for a post-judgment, worldwide Mareva injunction following a successful suit by First Majestic Silver Corp.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

First Majestic Silver Corp. v. Davila, 2013 BCSC 1212 And 2013 BCSC 1704

These decisions reviewed the appropriate terms for a post-judgment, worldwide Mareva injunction following a successful suit by First Majestic Silver Corp. (First Silver) against a former corporate director (director)1 for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with a lost corporate opportunity to acquire a mining property in Mexico known as "Bolaños." The director indirectly acquired the Bolaños property when he purchased shares in Minerales y Minas Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (MMM), the Mexican company that owned the property. Damages were awarded against the director and MMM (Defendants), jointly and severally, in the amount of US$93.84 million. After trial, First Silver applied for a Mareva injunction to freeze the assets of the Defendants within and outside British Columbia in order to secure payment of the judgment. Prior to delivering reasons, the Court issued a status quo order, which imposed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from