Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 DECEMBER 2011

EU Fuel Directive: A Discriminatory And Deceitful Sham

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Product extracted from Canada's oilsands is being attacked by environmentalists on two fronts: in the U.S. through opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline, and in Europe, through the proposed implementation of a fuel standard that purports to seek a six-per-cent reduction in the carbon intensity of Europe's transport fuel supply by 2020 - to 83 grams of carbon dioxide per megajoule of energy (g/Mj).

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

Originally published in the Edmonton Journal

Product extracted from Canada's oilsands is being attacked by environmentalists on two fronts: in the U.S. through opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline, and in Europe, through the proposed implementation of a fuel standard that purports to seek a six-per-cent reduction in the carbon intensity of Europe's transport fuel supply by 2020 - to 83 grams of carbon dioxide per megajoule of energy (g/Mj).

The two main sources of carbon are driving and the combustion of coal to generate electricity. A non-discriminatory transport fuel standard that accurately tracks the carbon emissions generated in the production and consumption of specific crude blends would be a legitimate regulatory tool to protect the environment. As designed, however, the EU's proposed standard is not. Rather, it's a disguised restriction on trade that violates a number of WTO provisions, and an arbitrary and unjustifiable means to discriminate against

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from