Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MARCH 2017

Dueling Environmental Experts: The Court Accepts The More Fact-Based, Reliable And Plausible Explanation

Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP
Explore more from Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP

When a party finds itself in an environmental dispute, what evidence must it submit to support its case? And will that evidence succeed in Court?

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

When a party finds itself in an environmental dispute, what evidence must it submit to support its case? And will that evidence succeed in Court? For example, consider a dispute between neighbours where one neighbour alleges that the other is causing the migration of contamination across their shared property line. Each neighbour hires an expert in contaminant hydrogeology to support his or her theory of the case. How will a Court decide which of the two competing experts' evidence to base its decision on?

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently considered this question in Weenen v Biadi.1

Mr. Weenen and Mr. Biadi were neighbours in a rural area. Water covered a significant portion of Mr. Weenen's property. The flooded portions of the property were unusable.2

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from