Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2019

Case Law Summaries – Municipal Law

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In this decision, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that the use of a property for the extraction of aggregates was not permitted under the applicable zoning bylaw.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

COBALT (TOWN) V. COMENA (TOWNSHIP), 2018 ONSC 3713

In this decision, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that the use of a property for the extraction of aggregates was not permitted under the applicable zoning bylaw.

The case involved a parcel of land in the Coleman Township — known as the "Cobalt pit property" —that was owned by the Town of Cobalt. Cobalt sought a declaration that its use of the property for aggregate extraction was permitted. The applicable zoning bylaw in Coleman Township zoned a portion of the property as "residential" and another as "development." The residential zone did not permit pits or quarries, while the development zone permitted existing non-residential uses.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from