Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2016

Buffalo River Dene Nation v. Saskatchewan (Energy And Resources), 2015 SKCA 31

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In this case, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held that the duty to consult will only be triggered where a Crown decision will have an "appreciable and current potential" to adversely impact a treaty or Aboriginal right.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

Buffalo River Dene Nation v. Saskatchewan (Energy And Resources), 2015 SKCA 31

In this case, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal held that the duty to consult will only be triggered where a Crown decision will have an "appreciable and current potential" to adversely impact a treaty or Aboriginal right. The duty will not be triggered where adverse impacts are merely speculative.

Buffalo River Dene Nation is a signatory of Treaty 10. The treaty obligates the Crown to consult with the First Nation before authorizing activities that could interfere with treaty rights. In this case, the Ministry of Energy and Resources granted an exploration permit in respect of subsurface oil sands minerals located under Treaty 10 lands without consultation. The First Nation applied for judicial review, and asserted that the Crown had breached its duty to consult.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from