Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MARCH 2016

B2Gold Corp. v. Condor Resources PLC, 2015 BCSC 1548

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

This British Columbia Supreme Court decision emphasizes the importance of due diligence in the specific context of an agreement that incorporates a second agreement by reference.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

B2Gold Corp. v. Condor Resources PLC, 2015 BCSC 1548

This British Columbia Supreme Court decision emphasizes the importance of due diligence in the specific context of an agreement that incorporates a second agreement by reference.

B2Gold entered into a letter agreement with Condor, a U.K.-based gold exploration company, for the exchange of concessions in Nicaragua. To carry out the exchange, B2Gold was to cause its subsidiary, Triton, to transfer two concessions to Condor, one of which the letter agreement specified was "subject to a 3% NSR in favour of Royal Gold." The NSR originated in a royalty agreement between Triton's predecessor and Royal Gold's successor, RG Exchangeco.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from