Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MARCH 2013

Avanti v. Argex, 2012 ONSC 4395

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In this case, the Ontario Superior Court applied the real and substantial connection test developed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Van Breda to an application concerning a dispute over the termination of a mining services agreement.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

In this case, the Ontario Superior Court (ONSC) applied the real and substantial connection test developed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Van Breda (see above) to an application concerning a dispute over the termination of a mining services agreement.

The services agreement was between Avanti Management and Consulting Limited (Avanti) and Argex Mining Inc. (Argex) and was in respect of services to be provided to Argex by Mr. Michael Dehn, in the capacity of Head of Technology and Business Development. Argex owned three mineral properties in Québec containing titanium ore. In order to extract and purify titanium oxide from the titanium ore, Argex uses a process over which the Ontario company Canadian Titanium Ltd. (CTL) owns the patent. The services agreement contemplated Mr. Dehn's involvement in the development and commercialization of the extraction process. Argex terminated the services agreement when it learned that Mr. Dehn was to become the president of a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from